
In the 1950’s, composers such as Earl Brown and Gyorgy Ligeti questioned the linearity of musical scores, where the composer would recite the score perfectly without any improvisations, and sought out a flexible score that could offer both the performers and the composer choices rather that a set path for a musical work. Their choices may be dependent on their current moods, and the atmosphere in which they are currently in. This flexibility was obtained through the use of sections and fragments within the score, where rearranging the parts was not only endlessly possible, but encouraged. This lead to a measure of unpredictability in the final work of music. Traditional logic, predictability and linearity was exempt from the music process. Ligeti looked at Calder Mobiles (shown below) for analogies to this idea, where the color, shape, and elements of the pieces were fixed, while the movement of these pieces and thus the compositions were constantly in motion.
This idea is similar to architecture in which for several decades, architecture was communicated without a sense of interpretation. The building (musical work) was communicated through building plans (scores) that were to be performed exactly as planned regardless of the current mood or atmosphere of the site or the user.
The mobile idea of the music center follows the question of linearity Brown and Ligeti performed in music, where the architect (composer) cannot always predict the final outcome. The construction of the center is communicated through building plans, each with a sense of flexibility in the final outcome. This flexibility is sought out to let the current site conditions (mood/ atmosphere) and the users be the determining factor in the building’s composition, thus making it site specific, just like a static building. The static element in a music score, being the staff, and the shape and color of the calder mobile's pieces, is architecturally analogous the building frame, while the sections and fragments will be the panels used to wrap the frame, offering a series of options. The chosen configuration will be relative to the site to account for sun paths, access points, weather conditions, views, and context.







Chanel Mobile Art Pavilion
Architect: Zaha Hadid
Client: Chanel
Year Completed: 2008
Typology: Mobile pavilion set to exhibit contemporary art and Chanel products all across the world, from Paris, Tokyo, and New York.
Key Facts: Two elements seperated by a court yard, the structure is a series of continuous curved components, each approx. 2.25m wide, covering a lighweight steel frame that can be assembled and unassembled in under a week. The overall size of the pavilion is 29m x 45m totaling 700sqm. The height is only 6m with the floor raised 1m above the existing ground surface. Exterior lighting allows multiple effects on the structures surface for a variety of programs for different cities. The glazed ceiling adjusts to different temperature and climate conditions of the current city it enters.
More information:
http://www.chanel-mobileart.com/
http://zahahadidblog.com/projects/2007/06/13/zahas-travelling-exhibition-pavilion-for-chanel



Prada Transformer
Architect: Rem Koolhaas and AMO Think-Tank
Client: Prada
Typology: A Mobile exhibit for music, art, fashion, and theater performances
Year Completed: 2008
Key Facts: A 20m high tetrahedron structure set to accommodate cultural, artistic, and fashion events for Prada. The structure, which is covered by a smooth elastic membrane, can be rotated to best suit the chosen event, with 4 different facades that can become the floor, walls, or ceiling. These facades, all built in a steel-frame, are unique by their shapes, being a hexagon, a cross, a circle, and a rectangle. LG Electronics supported the Transformer along with Hyundai Motor Co. and others.
More Information:
http://prada-transformer.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tc5dZ7lnoG0&feature=player_embedded



Austrian Pavilion at Expo 2010
Architect: Span and Zeytinoglu
Client: World Expo 2010 Shanghai
Year Completed: 2010
Typology: A temporary pavilion to showcase Austrian music, from Baroque to Contemporary
Key Facts: Music is the concept, reflecting continuity and seamlessness ssthroughout the architecture’s various spaces. Those spaces include the chamber, a restaurant, shop, offices, and a VIP Area. Each area was diagnosed and created through mathematical and geometrical processes that embody SPAN, which is known as one of the most innovative architectural practices.
More Information:
http://www.dezeen.com/2009/04/09/austrian-pavilion-at-expo-2010-by-span-and-zeytinoglu/





Mobile Art Gallery Concept:
Architects: Victor Paixao, Miguel Felipe, Muralha, Paula Sertorio, Thiago Florez, Andre Mack and Bruno Castro
Client: London 2008 competition organized by Arquitectum
Typology: A mobile barge set to travel down the Thames River in London to showcase art.
Key Facts: The transparency of the building offer different perspectives of the city as it travels down the river. Internal and external spaces seem to blur. Three ellipses were generated to evoke the three different uses of the space while a second layer of glass uses a ‘switchable glass” system controls the opacity of the glass given a particular use. Uses include temporary exhibitions, an auditorium, multiple observation areas, and cafe areas.
More Information:
http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/21/adaptable-architecture-gallery/